<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W180 10.1MP Digital Camera with 3x SteadyShot Stabilized Zoom and 2.7-inch LCD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jtxs.net/sony-cyber-shot-dsc-w180-101mp-digital-camera-with-3x-steadyshot-stabilized-zoom-and-27-inch-lcd-2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jtxs.net/sony-cyber-shot-dsc-w180-101mp-digital-camera-with-3x-steadyshot-stabilized-zoom-and-27-inch-lcd-2</link>
	<description>we recommend the best stuff !</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.jtxs.net/sony-cyber-shot-dsc-w180-101mp-digital-camera-with-3x-steadyshot-stabilized-zoom-and-27-inch-lcd-2/comment-page-1#comment-4047</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 02:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jtxs.net/sony-cyber-shot-dsc-w180-101mp-digital-camera-with-3x-steadyshot-stabilized-zoom-and-27-inch-lcd-2#comment-4047</guid>
		<description>I purchased this camera after losing my Sony P200 (which I liked very much).  By appearances the camera looked good, and it was compact and simple to use.  The problem came when you actually took a picture.  I had read in another review that the 180 made pictures look "oily".  I really didn't give this review much thought until looking at the pictures I took.  In addition to poor low light (indoor) pictures, many of the pictures did in fact have an "oily" appearance.  Faces looked as if individuals had been working up a sweat at the gym.  This also occurred in pictures not containing people, for instance, wood also had an oily appearance.  I might have tolerated the poor indoor picture quality, but the weird oily pictures were too much.  I took the camera back and purcahsed a Canon SD1200 IS, with which I am totally satisfied.  If you want decent pictures, I'd look at something other than the Sony DSC180. 


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I purchased this camera after losing my Sony P200 (which I liked very much).  By appearances the camera looked good, and it was compact and simple to use.  The problem came when you actually took a picture.  I had read in another review that the 180 made pictures look &#8220;oily&#8221;.  I really didn&#8217;t give this review much thought until looking at the pictures I took.  In addition to poor low light (indoor) pictures, many of the pictures did in fact have an &#8220;oily&#8221; appearance.  Faces looked as if individuals had been working up a sweat at the gym.  This also occurred in pictures not containing people, for instance, wood also had an oily appearance.  I might have tolerated the poor indoor picture quality, but the weird oily pictures were too much.  I took the camera back and purcahsed a Canon SD1200 IS, with which I am totally satisfied.  If you want decent pictures, I&#8217;d look at something other than the Sony DSC180.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--1aa115ecc5ef3a33dcf1707aa09cbb4c-->
