<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Star Trek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jtxs.net/star-trek-3/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jtxs.net/star-trek-3</link>
	<description>we recommend the best stuff !</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: darklordzden</title>
		<link>http://www.jtxs.net/star-trek-3/comment-page-1#comment-3924</link>
		<dc:creator>darklordzden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 10:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jtxs.net/star-trek-3#comment-3924</guid>
		<description>I am, it must be said, only a casual fan of "Star Trek" in that I thoroughly enjoyed watching the original series on TV, and the films which featured the original cast, and largely despised the "Next Generation" and the rest of it's tedious, politically correct ilk. That said, lest I sound like too much of a curmudgeon, let me state for the record that a big-screen reboot of the original series made with intelligence, style and affection - say along the lines of a Batman Begins (Widescreen Edition) or a Casino Royale (2-Disc Widescreen Edition) - would have been most welcome. 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;Unfortunately, that didn't happen and J.J. Abram's "Star Trek" is such a catastrophic misfire of a film that it's almost impossible to begin sifting through the wreckage in order to ascertain where it all went so horribly wrong. Suffice it to say, if you want a textbook example of how NOT to go about reviving a television and film franchise, then this film is it.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;So how did he screw it up so badly?
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;Well, for a start, He completely disregarded the canon of the original series; decided to film a script with so many plot and credibility holes that it could double as a hunk of Gorgonzola; and, by his own admission, embraced a film-making sensibility that was the polar opposite of the franchise concept in order to try and hook an audience that apparently suffers from attention deficit disorder and a low IQ.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;Largely though, you can ascribe the failure of this film to a case of misguided intent and having the wrong director at the helm.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;After all, when the first question on a director's mind when attempting to reboot "Star Trek" is "what can we learn from Star Wars here?" (as is established in a behind-the-scenes extra on the DVD) then you've pretty much instantaneously established that you've got the wrong man for the job. 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;"Star Trek" is not "Star Wars". People do not want "Star Trek" to be "Star Wars". If they want to watch "Star Wars" then they can go and watch "Star Wars".
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;I could go into myriad incidental details about what is bad about this film - the nauseating product placement; the irritating "camera flare" lighting; a "Death Star-esque" planet killing Macguffin that looks like a giant ball of Edam; the fact that the deck of the "Enterprise" looks like the interior of an iphone shop and that the engine room looks like the floor of a brewery - but they are not really the problem.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;The fundamental problem with this film is that, cosmetic similarities aside, it is not "Star Trek" in any way, shape or form. 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;Avoid this one like the plague. 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;My other half and I paid all of $3 to rent this DVD and still felt ripped off the following morning. 
&lt;br /&gt; 


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am, it must be said, only a casual fan of &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; in that I thoroughly enjoyed watching the original series on TV, and the films which featured the original cast, and largely despised the &#8220;Next Generation&#8221; and the rest of it&#8217;s tedious, politically correct ilk. That said, lest I sound like too much of a curmudgeon, let me state for the record that a big-screen reboot of the original series made with intelligence, style and affection - say along the lines of a Batman Begins (Widescreen Edition) or a Casino Royale (2-Disc Widescreen Edition) - would have been most welcome. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, that didn&#8217;t happen and J.J. Abram&#8217;s &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; is such a catastrophic misfire of a film that it&#8217;s almost impossible to begin sifting through the wreckage in order to ascertain where it all went so horribly wrong. Suffice it to say, if you want a textbook example of how NOT to go about reviving a television and film franchise, then this film is it.</p>
<p>So how did he screw it up so badly?</p>
<p>Well, for a start, He completely disregarded the canon of the original series; decided to film a script with so many plot and credibility holes that it could double as a hunk of Gorgonzola; and, by his own admission, embraced a film-making sensibility that was the polar opposite of the franchise concept in order to try and hook an audience that apparently suffers from attention deficit disorder and a low IQ.</p>
<p>Largely though, you can ascribe the failure of this film to a case of misguided intent and having the wrong director at the helm.</p>
<p>After all, when the first question on a director&#8217;s mind when attempting to reboot &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; is &#8220;what can we learn from Star Wars here?&#8221; (as is established in a behind-the-scenes extra on the DVD) then you&#8217;ve pretty much instantaneously established that you&#8217;ve got the wrong man for the job. </p>
<p>&#8220;Star Trek&#8221; is not &#8220;Star Wars&#8221;. People do not want &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; to be &#8220;Star Wars&#8221;. If they want to watch &#8220;Star Wars&#8221; then they can go and watch &#8220;Star Wars&#8221;.</p>
<p>I could go into myriad incidental details about what is bad about this film - the nauseating product placement; the irritating &#8220;camera flare&#8221; lighting; a &#8220;Death Star-esque&#8221; planet killing Macguffin that looks like a giant ball of Edam; the fact that the deck of the &#8220;Enterprise&#8221; looks like the interior of an iphone shop and that the engine room looks like the floor of a brewery - but they are not really the problem.</p>
<p>The fundamental problem with this film is that, cosmetic similarities aside, it is not &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; in any way, shape or form. </p>
<p>Avoid this one like the plague. </p>
<p>My other half and I paid all of $3 to rent this DVD and still felt ripped off the following morning.<br /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. Kwiatkowska</title>
		<link>http://www.jtxs.net/star-trek-3/comment-page-1#comment-3923</link>
		<dc:creator>C. Kwiatkowska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 08:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jtxs.net/star-trek-3#comment-3923</guid>
		<description>Not to get on a rant... but this was one of the most awful movies of all time.  I love Trek... this isn't Trek.  Why keep making Trek movies for non-Trekkers?? Non-Trekkers aren't going to like it (if they even bother to see it), Trekkers aren't going to like it, and the franchise continues its spiral into the abyss.  
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;First off, you do a prequel (again- why?) and you don't have Shatner make a cameo?  I know he died in the Nexxus, but if we have no respect for the timeline anyway why the h*** not?  And just how many times are we going to revisit the pissed-off Romulan theme? 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;I won't even continue except to say that J.J. Abrams should be beamed into space for his perversion of the Trek franchise, his lack of creativity, and just his poor movie making. Zachary Quinto's portrayal of Spock was the only highlight in this garbage-fest. 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;If you liked Star Wars I, you will love this movie.  
&lt;br /&gt; 


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to get on a rant&#8230; but this was one of the most awful movies of all time.  I love Trek&#8230; this isn&#8217;t Trek.  Why keep making Trek movies for non-Trekkers?? Non-Trekkers aren&#8217;t going to like it (if they even bother to see it), Trekkers aren&#8217;t going to like it, and the franchise continues its spiral into the abyss.  </p>
<p>First off, you do a prequel (again- why?) and you don&#8217;t have Shatner make a cameo?  I know he died in the Nexxus, but if we have no respect for the timeline anyway why the h*** not?  And just how many times are we going to revisit the pissed-off Romulan theme? </p>
<p>I won&#8217;t even continue except to say that J.J. Abrams should be beamed into space for his perversion of the Trek franchise, his lack of creativity, and just his poor movie making. Zachary Quinto&#8217;s portrayal of Spock was the only highlight in this garbage-fest. </p>
<p>If you liked Star Wars I, you will love this movie.<br /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.jtxs.net/star-trek-3/comment-page-1#comment-3922</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 07:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jtxs.net/star-trek-3#comment-3922</guid>
		<description>OK, I'm a Trekkie from way back. In this film, which is a prologue to everything that's gone on in Star Trek, the romulans go back and wipe out Vulcan and thereby most of the Vulcan race. What kind of a moron would write such a script? What kind of a director would direct such a script? Perhaps the most pathetic of all were all the Trekkies coming out of the movie, grinning from ear to ear, giving a thumbs up to the movie. These particular Trekkies, if you were to put on a movie starring vegetables as the Star Trek crew, with the cucumber having pointed ears pasted on it, they would come out of the movie saying it was a great movie. Jesus! Get a life! Better yet, get a mind! 


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I&#8217;m a Trekkie from way back. In this film, which is a prologue to everything that&#8217;s gone on in Star Trek, the romulans go back and wipe out Vulcan and thereby most of the Vulcan race. What kind of a moron would write such a script? What kind of a director would direct such a script? Perhaps the most pathetic of all were all the Trekkies coming out of the movie, grinning from ear to ear, giving a thumbs up to the movie. These particular Trekkies, if you were to put on a movie starring vegetables as the Star Trek crew, with the cucumber having pointed ears pasted on it, they would come out of the movie saying it was a great movie. Jesus! Get a life! Better yet, get a mind!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--1aa115ecc5ef3a33dcf1707aa09cbb4c-->
